https://www.cfact.org/wp-content/upload ... -270417925
Je ne connais rien au sujet. J'ai toujours pensé que les postures anti-réchauffement climatiques étaient surtout de mauvaise fois et que leurs rapports étaient soumis à de gros conflits d'intérêt.
Mais ce rapport qui sonne assez "juste" et semble sérieux est-il valable ? je n'arrive pas à me positionner.
Avez-vous de la documentation statistique solide sur le contraire (le réchauffement climatique, la montée des eaux etc...) ?
Je veux juste savoir quelle est la posture et la vision la plus juste. Merci.
Ici les point principaux développés dans le rapport concernant le réchauffement, la fonte glaciaire et la disparition des ours polaires (entre autres. Je les laisse en anglais plutôt que de mettre une traduction approximative tirée google traduction
) :Global temperatures have been virtually flat for about 18 years, according to satellite data, and peer-reviewed literature is now scaling back predictions of future warming
The U.S. has had no Category 3 or larger hurricane make landfall since 2005 – the longest spell since the Civil War.
Strong F3 or larger tornadoes have been in decline since the 1970s.
Despite claims of snow being ‘a thing of the past,’ cold season snowfall has been rising.
Sea level rise rates have been steady for over a century, with recent deceleration.
Droughts and floods are neither historically unusual nor caused by mankind, and there is no evidence we are currently having any unusual weather.
So-called hottest year claims are based on year-to-year temperature data that differs by only a few HUNDREDTHS of a degree to tenths of a degree Fahrenheit – differences that are within the margin of error in the data. In other words, global temperatures have essentially held very steady with no sign of acceleration.
A 2015 NASA study found Antarctica was NOT losing ice mass and ‘not currently contributing to sea level rise.
In 2016, Arctic sea ice was 22% greater than at the recent low point of 2012. The Arctic sea ice is now in a 10-year ‘pause’ with ‘no significant change in the past decade’
Deaths due to extreme weather have declined dramatically.
Polar bears are doing fine, with their numbers way up since the 1960s.
Bon, je veux pas rêver non plus... ce serait trop beau. Mais merci à ceux qui amènent de la documentation solide contestant ce rapport
vos liens et techniques de recherche me sont très utiles ! Il n'y a donc pas une banque de données regroupant tous les articles (comme psychinfo pour les études psy ou pubmed pour les articles biomédicaux) ?
